Is de Broyle's relationship p = h/λ consistent with the principle of Uncertainty of Hessenberg Δx.Δp=ℏ/2 !

Heisenberg Principle Of Uncertainty

The principle of Uncertainty Heisenberg tells you that you can't automatically determine the location and amount of massive momentum (movement momentum) to check it in another way depending on the relationship established by De Broly, which links the momentum of the particle to the length of its wave!

The amount of thrust or momentum of the movement p for very small particles according to quantum mechanics which has been developed by Louis de Brule writes as follows:

p = h/λ

So through this relationship we note that this momentum is inversely proportional to the wavelength of the particle wave function and this shows that determining the momentum of the particle is closely related to the formation of the particle formed in a wave.

Meaning you can't determine this amount of propulsion unless there's a wave function associated with the particle, but if we want to locate the x particle, the particle wave function has to collapse at a single point where the particle is located, we are, as we have always done in classical mechanics, we cannot determine the location of a wave because it is We're all over the place. Determining the momentum of this particle requires us to have this particle formed in a wavelength function, not a particle because we need the wavelength to determine this momentum.

Therefore, any attempt to determine the location of the particle threatens to collapse the particle's waveform and the wave function collapse, meaning that the wavelength of the wavefunction cannot be known, and the impossibility of knowing the wavelength of the wavefunction means that it is impossible to determine the momentum of the particle at that location where the function collapsed. Waveform of the particle. Therefore, the immediate location and momentum of the particle is never possible according to this simple relationship, which is certainly consistent with the Hessenberg principle of Uncertainty (certainty).

Note : The strange thing is that this wave function developed by Schrodinger is not a real wave but is an imaginary wave, even Schrodinger himself and despite the placement of that strange equation in quantum mechanics which contains a wave function of the particle, did not understand what it is and could not realistically imagine it because it contains the imaginary number i but it is This has remained fragmented and egypt as a real wave, although it cannot explain how a real wave contains the imaginary number i. Because the type of waves we know does not really contain the imaginary number i although we use it in electromagnetic waves ... In the case of electromagnetic waves, the waves are just sin functions (cos and sin) and we are the ones who add to it the imaginary part only as a way to facilitate calculation but in the end we take from this complex function that contains the imaginary number i the real part only and leave the imaginary part that contains i because it just adds re The light is physically meaningless, but in this case with the particle wave function at first glance this wave appears complex and contains the imaginary number i and we are not the ones adding it to it and that is what was a problem in understanding what this complex wave function is in quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanics continued to walk despite the strangeness of some of the concepts they contain, and this wave function was a mystery to all physicists, except after Max Bourne came and said that this wave function can only be a real wave and can only be used as a wave function for the possible possibilities of particle sites ... Despite Schrodinger's strong objection to this idea because he was following Einstein's approach and not wanting the possibility to go within the scope of determining the location of the particle, his objection was not accepted, so he said if it was going to work out like this, I would regret the contribution I made to Mechanics quantum.